Screening algorithms to reduce burden of pediatric HIV testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of symptom screening to identify children eligible for further HIV testing in generalized epidemics has been examined in several studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies. METHODS: We screened 5 databases and abstracts from 4 HIV/AIDS conferences. Studies were included if they were performed in clinical settings, included children of 0-15 years old, and used a signs/symptoms screen to determine eligibility for HIV testing. The primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of the screening tools. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the utility of a screening tool in the outpatient setting. RESULTS: Our search returned 5529 database results and approximately 6700 conference abstracts, of which 36 articles were reviewed and 7 met criteria for inclusion. All were prospective or cross-sectional studies that developed and/or validated a screening tool to identify children at higher risk for being HIV infected. Sensitivity of the screening tools ranged from 71% to 96%, whereas specificity ranged from 25% to 99%. Meta-analysis of studies evaluating outpatient screening tools revealed a sensitivity of 81.4%, with a specificity of 69.4% for detecting HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have evaluated the use of screening tools for HIV diagnosis in children. Screening tools that exist showed only moderate sensitivity and specificity and missed a substantial number of HIV-infected children in high-prevalence areas. In outpatient settings, the use of a screening tool may help reduce the number of HIV tests needed to identify an HIV-infected child, but at the cost of missed diagnoses. Further studies are needed to determine whether this represents a resource-saving mechanism

• Epidemiology and Determinants of Health
  • Epidemiology
• Population(s)
  • Children or Youth (less than 18 years old)
• Testing
  • Testing