Motivations, facilitators, and barriers of donation-based interventions in HIV and sexually transmitted infection research: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE: Donation-based prosocial interventions involve someone receiving a free health service and then distributing or donating to support health services for others; examples within the HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) literature include secondary distribution of HIV self-tests, secondary syringe exchange, and pay it forward for STI testing. These interventions answer research and policy recommendations to incorporate prosocial behaviors into HIV/STI services. OBJECTIVE: To describe motivations, facilitators, and barriers of donation-based interventions in HIV and STI research using data from qualitative studies. EVIDENCE REVIEW: In this systematic review, 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus) and references were searched up to January 23, 2024, for qualitative studies of donation-based interventions. Thematic synthesis was used to summarize findings, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist was used to assess risk of bias among studies, and GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence From Reviews of Qualitative Research) was used to assess confidence in review findings. FINDINGS: Of 374 studies screened, 27 were included, which included 1543 participants, assessing secondary distribution of HIV self-tests (15 studies), secondary syringe exchange among people who inject drugs (10 studies), and pay it forward for STI testing (2 studies). Studies were from low-income (5 studies), middle-income (13 studies), and high-income (12 studies) countries. Givers who distributed health services were motivated by a selfless concern to benefit others (20 studies, moderate confidence) and by the cultivation of a prosocial identity (20 studies, moderate confidence). Social proximity between givers and recipients facilitated distribution (22 studies, moderate confidence), allowing for recipient-tailored strategies to introduce the service, strengthen peer relationships, and promote reciprocal giving. However, secondary syringe distribution could subject people who use drugs to legal harms and encourage them to provide unsupervised clinical care (7 studies, low confidence). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review identified motivations, facilitators, and barriers of donation-based interventions for HIV/STI services that could enhance implementation. Donation-based interventions may foster prosocial motivation and responsibility among socially marginalized populations to increase access to HIV/STI services.

• Epidemiology and Determinants of Health
  • Determinants of Health
• Determinants of Health
  • Housing
  • Food security
  • Income
  • Education
  • Social support
  • Health services
  • Stigma/discrimination
  • Abuse
  • Other
• Population(s)
  • General HIV- population
• Prevention, Engagement and Care Cascade
  • Prevention
• Prevention
  • Drug use behaviours/harm reduction
• Testing
  • Testing
• Health Systems
  • Delivery arrangements